| Things I Just Don't Get |
[Oct. 23rd, 2009|10:45 am] |
There is something I'd very much like to understand about webcomic readers, and I guess in people in general - why is that there is a such a need to express your hatred for something?
Here's what sparked my curiosity. This past week, Scott Kurtz of PvP did a storyline revolving around a random, non-canon character called LOLBAT, a superhero parody of internet memes. Up until now, Scott has only done one-offs, just random strips here and there involving the character. But he apparently really wanted to do this brief storyline; it was something that excited him. And to be honest, I'm glad he did, because it paid off in a big way today.
All that aside, though, he mentioned in his blog post that LOLBAT has had the effect of polarizing his readership - folks either love the character or despise him. Scott mentioned getting emails about peoples' hate for the character. And it was that mention of emails that got me thinking - why would someone do that?
Seriously, if someone sent me an email telling me how much they hate Francis, I would be less hurt/angry and more puzzled at why they felt they needed to tell me. Sure, everyone is entitled to their opinion, but do they really think that expressing their hatred is a productive venture?
Is it the immediacy of email that leads to this? You see something that you hate and you know that within five minutes you can write up that hatred and send it spinning through the interwebs at the person who is responsible. There, you did it... now what? What comes after that knee-jerk response? Is there an expectation of change? Just because you don't like something, you expect to change the creator's mind so that they'll stop putting that character in the comic? I just really can't wrap my mind around that mentality. It's their comic; they'll do as they please regardless of how you feel (well, most of them will).
In a related story, Least I Could Do recently did a week long one-off story with Rayne leading a TED conference about a number of things. I don't venture into the forums often, but Katie told me that people were getting pissed at Sohmer for writing that arc, basically telling him to get off of his soapbox, get back to the funny, and (my personal favorite) that Rayne wouldn't do that.
First of all, we are brought back to a subject that has circulated through the webcomic world on numerous ocassions - entitlement. You, as a reader, have no reason to feel entitled to anything (and ironically enough, the subject of entitlement came up in the fictional TED conference, though not in relation to webcomic readers). You read a free comic, free comic, and you expect, even demand, things from the creator? Even if you do donate or buy a t-shirt or a book, that does not make you a shareholder. That makes you a supporter, not of one portion of the comic, not the portion that you like, but the whole thing, good and bad. There are no Terms of Service that state that by giving the creator money, you now have some stake in the comic. You have no right to demand anything. None. End of discussion. And to whoever said that Rayne wouldn't do something like that obviously hasn't read the comic for very long. Ridiculous.
Maybe Penny Arcade isn't far off the mark with their equation: Normal Person + Anonymity + Audience (in this case, the webcomic creator who has made his/her contact info available) = Total Fuckwad. |
|
|